User talk:FloraC: Difference between revisions

Line 263:

::::::::: But if you're fine with ''nexisma'' then you should be fine with ''nexma'' as well. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:30, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::: Not so fast. Instances of "s" that are stuck between two stop sounds, like what happens when "nexma" is pronounced as [ˈnæ̠kspmə], make it sound almost like there ought to be an extra syllable near the "s" as the lack of such a syllable strikes me as less than ideal in terms of syllable structure. In contrast, "nexisma", which is likely to be pronounced as [næ̠kˈse̽zbmə], actually ''does'' have the extra vowel, so you don't have a case of an "s" stuck between two stop sounds. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 12:36, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

== 625/624 ==

@@ Line 263: / Line 263: @@
 ::::::::: But if you're fine with ''nexisma'' then you should be fine with ''nexma'' as well. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:30, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
+:::::::::: Not so fast.  Instances of "s" that are stuck between two stop sounds, like what happens when "nexma" is pronounced as [ˈnæ̠kspmə], make it sound almost like there ought to be an extra syllable near the "s" as the lack of such a syllable strikes me as less than ideal in terms of syllable structure.  In contrast, "nexisma", which is likely to be pronounced as [næ̠kˈse̽zbmə], actually ''does'' have the extra vowel, so you don't have a case of an "s" stuck between two stop sounds. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 12:36, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 == 625/624 ==