User talk:FloraC: Difference between revisions

Line 273:

:: Right. However, it doesn't look like all 17-limit superparticular commas have been named though, so should I try naming some of those? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 09:37, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

::: Try as you may, it makes more sense if you have some interesting theories or actual uses about them. So far even the named ones are barely explored: we haven't got pages for commas that are as easy to approach as 256/255, 289/288, and 513/512. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 11:15, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:37, 27 December 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 6,010 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:15, 27 December 2020 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 24,946 edits →625/624: re Newer edit →
Line 273:		Line 273:

	:: Right. However, it doesn't look like all 17-limit superparticular commas have been named though, so should I try naming some of those? --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 09:37, 27 December 2020 (UTC)		:: Right. However, it doesn't look like all 17-limit superparticular commas have been named though, so should I try naming some of those? --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 09:37, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

			::: Try as you may, it makes more sense if you have some interesting theories or actual uses about them. So far even the named ones are barely explored: we haven't got pages for commas that are as easy to approach as 256/255, 289/288, and 513/512. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 11:15, 27 December 2020 (UTC)