Xenharmonic Wiki

Misty family: Difference between revisions

← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Review
Normalization; POTE -> CTE; review optimal ET sequences
Line 16: Line 16:
: mapping generators: ~512/405, ~3
: mapping generators: ~512/405, ~3


[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~512/405 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.111
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~512/405 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.2481


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 285, 384 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 285, 384, 483c }}


[[Badness]]: 0.106540
[[Badness]]: 0.106540
Line 35: Line 35:
{{Multival|legend=1| 3 -12 -30 -26 -56 -36 }}
{{Multival|legend=1| 3 -12 -30 -26 -56 -36 }}


[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.145
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.1448


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 87, 99 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, …, 87, 99 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.036802
[[Badness]]: 0.036802
Line 80: Line 80:
Mapping: {{mapping| 3 0 26 56 77 | 0 1 -4 -10 -14 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 3 0 26 56 77 | 0 1 -4 -10 -14 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.210
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.3127


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 87, 99e, 186e }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, …, 87, 99e, 186e }}


Badness: 0.035932
Badness: 0.035932
Line 93: Line 93:
Mapping: {{mapping| 3 0 26 56 77 92 | 0 1 -4 -10 -14 -17 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 3 0 26 56 77 92 | 0 1 -4 -10 -14 -17 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.303
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.3859


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12f, 87, 99ef, 186ef, 273ef }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, …, 87, 186ef }}


Badness: 0.027820
Badness: 0.027820
Line 106: Line 106:
Mapping: {{mapping| 3 0 26 56 77 92 -2 | 0 1 -4 -10 -14 -17 3 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 3 0 26 56 77 92 -2 | 0 1 -4 -10 -14 -17 3 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~34/27 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.233
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~34/27 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.3686


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12f, 87, 99ef, 186efg }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 87, 99ef, 186efg }}


Badness: 0.023908
Badness: 0.023908
Line 119: Line 119:
Mapping: {{mapping| 3 0 26 56 77 92 -2 8 | 0 1 -4 -10 -14 -17 3 1 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 3 0 26 56 77 92 -2 8 | 0 1 -4 -10 -14 -17 3 1 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~34/27 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.253
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~24/19 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.3626


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12f, 87, 99ef, 186efgh }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 87, 99ef, 186efgh }}


Badness: 0.019878
Badness: 0.019878
Line 132: Line 132:
Mapping: {{mapping| 3 0 26 56 77 -46 | 0 1 -4 -10 -14 12 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 3 0 26 56 77 -46 | 0 1 -4 -10 -14 12 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.311
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.3285


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 87, 186e, 273e }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 87, 186e, 273e }}


Badness: 0.036872
Badness: 0.036872
Line 147: Line 147:
: mapping generators: ~55/49, ~3
: mapping generators: ~55/49, ~3


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 702.9764
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 703.0864


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 174e, 186, 198, 408cde, 606bcde }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 174e, 186, 198, 408cde, 606bcde }}


Badness: 0.068509
Badness: 0.068509
Line 160: Line 160:
Mapping: {{mapping| 6 0 52 112 173 203 | 0 1 -4 -10 -16 -19 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 6 0 52 112 173 203 | 0 1 -4 -10 -16 -19 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 703.0087
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 703.1045


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12f, 174ef, 186, 198 }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 174ef, 186, 198 }}


Badness: 0.044073
Badness: 0.044073
Line 175: Line 175:
: mapping generators: ~63/50, ~400/231
: mapping generators: ~63/50, ~400/231


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~400/231 = 951.527
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~400/231 = 951.5721


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 24d, 87, 111, 198 }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 24d, 87, 111, 198 }}


Badness: 0.047439
Badness: 0.047439
Line 188: Line 188:
Mapping: {{mapping| 3 0 26 56 8 23 | 0 2 -8 -20 1 -5 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 3 0 26 56 8 23 | 0 2 -8 -20 1 -5 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~26/15 = 951.525
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~26/15 = 951.5810


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 24d, 87, 111, 198 }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 24d, 87, 111, 198 }}


Badness: 0.022923
Badness: 0.022923
Line 201: Line 201:
[[Comma list]]: 225/224, 156250/151263
[[Comma list]]: 225/224, 156250/151263


{{Mapping|legend=1| 3 5 6 7 | 0 -1 4 6 }}
{{Mapping|legend=1| 3 0 26 37 | 0 1 -4 -6 }}


{{Multival|legend=1| 3 -12 -18 -26 -37 -8 }}
{{Multival|legend=1| 3 -12 -18 -26 -37 -8 }}


[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~80/63 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 704.118
: mapping generators: ~80/63, ~3


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 51, 63, 75 }}
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~80/63 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 704.3694
 
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 39c, 51, 63, 75 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.086866
[[Badness]]: 0.086866
Line 216: Line 218:
Comma list: 100/99, 225/224, 2420/2401
Comma list: 100/99, 225/224, 2420/2401


Mapping: {{mapping| 3 5 6 7 8 | 0 -1 4 6 10 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 3 0 26 37 58 | 0 1 -4 -6 -10 }}
 
: mapping generators: ~44/35, ~3


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 704.411
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 704.6253


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 51, 63, 138de }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 39ce, 51, 63, 138de }}


Badness: 0.051348
Badness: 0.051348
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/w/Misty_family"