Talk:5120/5103: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Closing |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
# '''Yes'''. "Argentic" should still refer to the 2.3.7/5 subgroup temperament, however, per the change I made. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 20:18, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | # '''Yes'''. "Argentic" should still refer to the 2.3.7/5 subgroup temperament, however, per the change I made. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 20:18, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | ||
# '''Yes''', I find it a lot more usefully descriptive. Hemififths and Amity are far from the main temperaments I associate with the comma, and Aberschismic comparatively describes quite well how I tend to use it (to equate 81/80~64/63 as a singular aberrisma) [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 20:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | # '''Yes''', I find it a lot more usefully descriptive. Hemififths and Amity are far from the main temperaments I associate with the comma, and Aberschismic comparatively describes quite well how I tend to use it (to equate 81/80~64/63 as a singular aberrisma) [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 20:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | ||
# '''Yes'''. [[User:DotuXil|dotuXil]] <span style="color:#f50c7d">(i like microtones)</span> 21:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes''', I'm ok with it in part since I was involved in coining the name [[User:Tristanbay|Tristanbay]] ([[User talk:Tristanbay|talk]]) 06:03, 3 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes, if it means eliminating all other names''', cuz honestly I have no idea why not just call it "[[64/63|S8]]/[[81/80|S9]]" and be done with it. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 19:17, 4 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
: I was under the impression that "argent" won out in the community? – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 12:30, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | : I was under the impression that "argent" won out in the community? – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 12:30, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | ||
:: In my opinion it's a bit too confusing with the logarithmic argent tuning, even though it is closely related. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 15:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | :: In my opinion it's a bit too confusing with the logarithmic argent tuning, even though it is closely related. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 15:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | ||
::: Seconded. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 20:18, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | ::: Seconded. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 20:18, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | ||
:::: Thirded. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 19:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
---- | |||
Closing for near-universal consensus. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:12, 6 June 2026 (UTC) | |||