Fractional-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 237: / Line 237: @@
 Subgroup: 2.3.5
-Comma list: [-225 24 -56]
+Comma list: {{monzo|-225 24 -56}}
-Mapping: 56 89 131, 0 -1 -4
+Mapping: [{{val|56 89 131}}, {{val|0 -1 -4}}]
 Mapping generators: ~81/80, ~3/2
@@ Line 249: / Line 249: @@
 Subgroup: 2.3.5.7
-Comma list: [ -12 29 -11 -3], [  47 -7  -7 -7]
+Comma list: {{monzo|-12 29 -11 -3}}, {{monzo|47 -7  -7 -7}}
-Mapping: 56 56 -1 321, 0 1 4 5
+Mapping: [{{val|56 56 -1 321}}, {{val|0 1 4 -5}}]
 Mapping generators: ~81/80, ~3/2
@@ Line 258: / Line 258: @@
 Vals: 224, 1848, 2072
+===11-limit===
+Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11
+Comma list: 9801/9800, 1019215872/1019046875, 14765025303/14763950080
+Mapping: [{{val|56 56 -1 321 292}}, {{val|0 1 4 5 -3}}]
+Mapping generators: ~81/80, ~3/2
+Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.943
 == 65th-octave temperaments ==
 [[65edo]] is accurate for harmonics 3, 5, and 11, so various 65th-octave temperaments actually make sense.