Fractional-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions

Eliora (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Eliora (talk | contribs)
Line 278: Line 278:
Comma list: 4096/4095, 91125/91091, 2912000/2910897, 369754/369603
Comma list: 4096/4095, 91125/91091, 2912000/2910897, 369754/369603


Mapping: 91 91 371 149 581 390, 0 1 -3 -2 -5 -1
Mapping: [{{val|91 91 371 149 581 390}}, {{val|0 1 -3 -2 -5 -1}}]


Mapping generators: ~1728/1715, ~3/2
Mapping generators: ~1728/1715, ~3/2
Line 284: Line 284:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.020c
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.020c


Optimal GPV sequence: 364, 1183, 1547
Optimal GPV sequence: {{EDOs|364, 1183, 1547}}
====17-limit====
====17-limit====
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17
Line 290: Line 290:
Comma list: 4096/4095, 14400/14399, 42500/42471, 75735/75712, 2100875/2100384
Comma list: 4096/4095, 14400/14399, 42500/42471, 75735/75712, 2100875/2100384


Mapping: 91 91 371 149 581 390 159, 0 1 -3 -2 -5 -1 4
Mapping: [{{91 91 371 149 581 390 159}}, {{val|0 1 -3 -2 -5 -1 4}}]


Mapping generators: ~3773/3744, ~3/2
Mapping generators: ~3773/3744, ~3/2
Line 296: Line 296:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.027c
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.027c


Optimal GPV sequence: 364, 1183, 1547
Optimal GPV sequence: {{EDOs|364, 1183, 1547}}
 
== 118th-octave temperaments ==
== 118th-octave temperaments ==
[[118edo|118EDO]] is accurate for harmonics 3 and 5, so various 118th-octave temperaments actually make sense.
[[118edo|118EDO]] is accurate for harmonics 3 and 5, so various 118th-octave temperaments actually make sense.