User talk:Xenwolf: Difference between revisions

Line 244:

:::::: Did I mention that chances are high that one might have difficulty combining the Helmholz syntonic comma arrows with the quartertone accidentals using existing fonts? I mean, the idea of combining these two things together seems fairly new, as Helmholz notation itself has a different symbols for 11-limit demisharps and seems to lack symbols for both 11-limit sesquisharps and sesquiflats... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 10:38, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

:::::: I can't believe I forgot about this, but I honestly think that there are other 11-limit chromas that need to be addressed besides just 33/32, as 45/44 and 55/54 seem to also be worth taking account of~~, and even~~ though I'm in favor of not only making a new version of Helmholz/Ellis notation in which the current symbol for raising by 33/32 is replaced by the mainstream demi-sharp accidental, but also putting the current Helmholz/Ellis symbol for raising by 33/32 to use in representing one of the other 11-limit chromas instead, the fact is that I don't have the capabilities nor the permissions to do such a thing myself... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 10:47, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

:::::: I can't believe I forgot about this, but I honestly think that there are other 11-limit chromas that need to be addressed besides just 33/32, as 45/44 and 55/54 seem to also be worth taking account of. Even though I'm in favor of not only making a new version of Helmholz/Ellis notation in which the current symbol for raising by 33/32 is replaced by the mainstream demi-sharp accidental but also putting the current Helmholz/Ellis symbol for raising by 33/32 to use in representing one of the other 11-limit chromas instead, the fact is that I don't have the capabilities nor the permissions to do such a thing myself... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 10:47, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:47, 3 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 10:49, 3 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 244:		Line 244:
	:::::: Did I mention that chances are high that one might have difficulty combining the Helmholz syntonic comma arrows with the quartertone accidentals using existing fonts? I mean, the idea of combining these two things together seems fairly new, as Helmholz notation itself has a different symbols for 11-limit demisharps and seems to lack symbols for both 11-limit sesquisharps and sesquiflats... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 10:38, 3 October 2020 (UTC)		:::::: Did I mention that chances are high that one might have difficulty combining the Helmholz syntonic comma arrows with the quartertone accidentals using existing fonts? I mean, the idea of combining these two things together seems fairly new, as Helmholz notation itself has a different symbols for 11-limit demisharps and seems to lack symbols for both 11-limit sesquisharps and sesquiflats... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 10:38, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

	:::::: I can't believe I forgot about this, but I honestly think that there are other 11-limit chromas that need to be addressed besides just 33/32, as 45/44 and 55/54 seem to also be worth taking account of~~, and even~~ though I'm in favor of not only making a new version of Helmholz/Ellis notation in which the current symbol for raising by 33/32 is replaced by the mainstream demi-sharp accidental, but also putting the current Helmholz/Ellis symbol for raising by 33/32 to use in representing one of the other 11-limit chromas instead, the fact is that I don't have the capabilities nor the permissions to do such a thing myself... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 10:47, 3 October 2020 (UTC)		:::::: I can't believe I forgot about this, but I honestly think that there are other 11-limit chromas that need to be addressed besides just 33/32, as 45/44 and 55/54 seem to also be worth taking account of. Even though I'm in favor of not only making a new version of Helmholz/Ellis notation in which the current symbol for raising by 33/32 is replaced by the mainstream demi-sharp accidental but also putting the current Helmholz/Ellis symbol for raising by 33/32 to use in representing one of the other 11-limit chromas instead, the fact is that I don't have the capabilities nor the permissions to do such a thing myself... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 10:47, 3 October 2020 (UTC)