User talk:Xenwolf: Difference between revisions

Line 236:

::: It seems to me that you are searching for a basis (or superset) of actual tonal systems. Do you know [[205edo]], which builds the basis of the [[Hunt System]]? Maybe the theory webpages of the author could be of help for you. About the ticks: you maybe show only the set of accidentals - I searched for the 159 relation in that graph. So the tick distance seem to be <code>1\159</code>, right? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 08:52, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

:::: The tick distance on that chart is indeed 1\159, and the distance between the larger ticks is one whole tone of 9/8. I feel it's necessary to show the ticks on some level to show how the accidentals relate to one another. That said, I wouldn't mind removing the composite accidentals and only showing the simple accidentals on the chart. That said, the Helmholz arrows indicating the raising or lowering by a syntonic comma seem to need a host accidental in order to even appear to begin with, and the only thing new about their appearance in this chart is that ~~thay~~ can now be bound ~~together with with~~ mainstream quartertone accidentals. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 10:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

:::: The tick distance on that chart is indeed 1\159, and the distance between the larger ticks is one whole tone of 9/8. I feel it's necessary to show the ticks on some level to show how the accidentals relate to one another. That said, I wouldn't mind removing the composite accidentals and only showing the simple accidentals on the chart. That said, the Helmholz arrows indicating the raising or lowering by a syntonic comma seem to need a host accidental in order to even appear to begin with, and the only thing new about their appearance in this chart is that they can now be bound to mainstream quartertone accidentals. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 10:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:04, 3 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 10:22, 3 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 236:		Line 236:
	::: It seems to me that you are searching for a basis (or superset) of actual tonal systems. Do you know [[205edo]], which builds the basis of the [[Hunt System]]? Maybe the theory webpages of the author could be of help for you. About the ticks: you maybe show only the set of accidentals - I searched for the 159 relation in that graph. So the tick distance seem to be <code>1\159</code>, right? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 08:52, 3 October 2020 (UTC)		::: It seems to me that you are searching for a basis (or superset) of actual tonal systems. Do you know [[205edo]], which builds the basis of the [[Hunt System]]? Maybe the theory webpages of the author could be of help for you. About the ticks: you maybe show only the set of accidentals - I searched for the 159 relation in that graph. So the tick distance seem to be <code>1\159</code>, right? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 08:52, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

	:::: The tick distance on that chart is indeed 1\159, and the distance between the larger ticks is one whole tone of 9/8. I feel it's necessary to show the ticks on some level to show how the accidentals relate to one another. That said, I wouldn't mind removing the composite accidentals and only showing the simple accidentals on the chart. That said, the Helmholz arrows indicating the raising or lowering by a syntonic comma seem to need a host accidental in order to even appear to begin with, and the only thing new about their appearance in this chart is that ~~thay~~ can now be bound ~~together with with~~ mainstream quartertone accidentals. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 10:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)		:::: The tick distance on that chart is indeed 1\159, and the distance between the larger ticks is one whole tone of 9/8. I feel it's necessary to show the ticks on some level to show how the accidentals relate to one another. That said, I wouldn't mind removing the composite accidentals and only showing the simple accidentals on the chart. That said, the Helmholz arrows indicating the raising or lowering by a syntonic comma seem to need a host accidental in order to even appear to begin with, and the only thing new about their appearance in this chart is that they can now be bound to mainstream quartertone accidentals. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 10:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)