Talk:TAMNAMS: Difference between revisions

Line 63:

::: We could also specify what kind of hard/soft we're talking about. Is it psychological (don't be so hard/soft on yourself), physical firmness or something else. That way it wouldn't be "dur" in French but "ferme" or something. --[[User:Frostburn|Frostburn]] ([[User talk:Frostburn|talk]]) 14:28, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

== Temperament-agnostic? ==

Is the TAMNAMS system actually temperament-agnostic? A majority of MOS names used in this system seems to be derived from temperaments, and an even larger proportion of the ones in the extension by Ganaram inukshuk are. Is temperament-agnosticness a goal but it hasn't been achieved yet?

If temperament-agnosticness is not a true goal of TAMNAMS, I think it should probably be renamed. Granted "MNAMS" doesn't really roll of the tongue like and also just means "MOS Naming System".

(FYI I do not view temperament-centricity as a bad thing, in fact I think it could be better than temperament-agnostic sometimes since you can memorize a MOS and temperament name in one go. It has issues for smaller MOSes though where you have lots of lots of temperaments in 1 MOS.)

[[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 09:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

@@ Line 63: / Line 63: @@
 ::: We could also specify what kind of hard/soft we're talking about. Is it psychological (don't be so hard/soft on yourself), physical firmness or something else. That way it wouldn't be "dur" in French but "ferme" or something. --[[User:Frostburn|Frostburn]] ([[User talk:Frostburn|talk]]) 14:28, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
+== Temperament-agnostic? ==
+Is the TAMNAMS system actually temperament-agnostic? A majority of MOS names used in this system seems to be derived from temperaments, and an even larger proportion of the ones in the extension by Ganaram inukshuk are. Is temperament-agnosticness a goal but it hasn't been achieved yet?
+If temperament-agnosticness is not a true goal of TAMNAMS, I think it should probably be renamed. Granted "MNAMS" doesn't really roll of the tongue like and also just means "MOS Naming System".
+(FYI I do not view temperament-centricity as a bad thing, in fact I think it could be better than temperament-agnostic sometimes since you can memorize a MOS and temperament name in one go. It has issues for smaller MOSes though where you have lots of lots of temperaments in 1 MOS.)
+[[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 09:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)