User talk:FloraC: Difference between revisions

Line 81:

:: In this case, I say "finalize" in regards to the selection of symbols themselves and their design- the remaining symbols are made from single symbols that have been strung together. Also, I'm wondering if support for custom accidentals can be incorporated into MuseScore 4. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 07:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

::: I'd say the selection of symbols and their design could be iterated through use as well. As for software, if Dorico can do it, I believe MuseScore too. Let's wait and see. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:30, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:18, 20 February 2021 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 6,010 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 07:30, 20 February 2021 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 24,946 edits →159edo Notation System: re Newer edit →
Line 81:		Line 81:

	:: In this case, I say "finalize" in regards to the selection of symbols themselves and their design- the remaining symbols are made from single symbols that have been strung together. Also, I'm wondering if support for custom accidentals can be incorporated into MuseScore 4. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 07:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)		:: In this case, I say "finalize" in regards to the selection of symbols themselves and their design- the remaining symbols are made from single symbols that have been strung together. Also, I'm wondering if support for custom accidentals can be incorporated into MuseScore 4. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 07:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

			::: I'd say the selection of symbols and their design could be iterated through use as well. As for software, if Dorico can do it, I believe MuseScore too. Let's wait and see. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 07:30, 20 February 2021 (UTC)