2.3.5.7.11.13.19 subgroup: Difference between revisions
m Cleanup & recategorize |
Lots of these are copied from 2.3.5.7.13, which doesn't make much sense here. Rework |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This subgroup is a [[rank and codimension|rank-7]] system, and can be modeled in a 6-dimensional [[lattice]], with the primes [[3/1|3]], [[5/1|5]], [[7/1|7]], [[11/1|11]], [[13/1|13]] and [[19/1|19]] represented by each dimension. The prime [[2/1|2]] does not appear in typical lattices because [[octave equivalence]] is presumed. If octave equivalence is not presumed, a seventh dimension is needed. | This subgroup is a [[rank and codimension|rank-7]] system, and can be modeled in a 6-dimensional [[lattice]], with the primes [[3/1|3]], [[5/1|5]], [[7/1|7]], [[11/1|11]], [[13/1|13]] and [[19/1|19]] represented by each dimension. The prime [[2/1|2]] does not appear in typical lattices because [[octave equivalence]] is presumed. If octave equivalence is not presumed, a seventh dimension is needed. | ||
== Regular temperaments == | == Regular temperaments == | ||
=== Rank-1 temperaments (edos) === | === Rank-1 temperaments (edos) === | ||
[[Edo]]s which represents the subgroup better ([[monotonic]] | [[Edo]]s which represents the subgroup better ([[monotonic]] in the no-17 [[19-odd-limit]] and decreasing [[TE error]]): {{EDOs|'''27e''', 31, 34dh, 38df, 41f, '''41''', 50, '''53''', 58h, '''72''', 87, 94, 103h, 111, 121, '''130''', '''152f''', 190, 217, 224, '''270''', 552, 581, … }} and so on. Bold edos are records of [[Tenney–Euclidean temperament measures #TE simple badness|TE relative error]]. | ||
{{Note|[[Wart notation]] is used to specify the [[val]] chosen for the edo. In the above list, "27e" means taking the second closest approximation of harmonic 11.}} | {{Note|[[Wart notation]] is used to specify the [[val]] chosen for the edo. In the above list, "27e" means taking the second closest approximation of harmonic 11.}} | ||
270edo is arguably the equal | [[270edo]] is arguably one of the best equal temperaments for this subgroup, achieving a record of [[relative error]] that no other equal temperament of its grain comes close to achieving. The next best ones are in the thousands of divisions: [[2190edo|2190]], [[6079edo|6079]], [[8269edo|8269]] and [[8539edo|8539]]. The last two coincidentally differ by 270 and are prime edos. | ||
=== Rank-2 temperaments === | === Rank-2 temperaments === | ||
[[Cassandra]] provides a very intuitive | [[Cassandra]] provides a very intuitive approximation to this subgroup using the [[chain of fifths]], naturally mapping 19/16 to the minor third, and is well represented with [[41edo]] and [[53edo]], though [[94edo]] is more optimized. | ||
For those searching higher-accuracy temperaments, [[cotoneum]] keeps the chain of fifths, but does not temper out the [[schisma]]. However, [[newt]], which splits the perfect fifth in halves (tempering out [[2401/2400]]) and finding the [[aberschisma]] -41 hemififths away, is much more efficient. Another similar temperament is [[gariwizmic]], which instead of splitting the fifth, splits the octave in half. Newt and gariwizmic meet in [[270edo]]. | |||
Other non-chain-of-fifths temperaments that meet in 270edo, and are thus great candidates for the subgroup, include [[vulture]], [[satin]], and [[paramity]]. | |||
=== Rank-3 temperaments === | |||
[[Cassaschismic]] relates several [[formal comma]]s in this subgroup to reduce them to essentially a generic comma a generic aberschisma, making it significant for notation systems based on the diatonic chain of fifths. Other temperaments that achieve a similar level of accuracy include [[lif]] and [[eir]]. | |||
[[Category:Just intonation subgroups]] | [[Category:Just intonation subgroups]] | ||
[[Category:19-limit]] | [[Category:19-limit]] | ||