Fractional-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions
Line 288: | Line 288: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.942 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.942 | ||
Vals: 836, 1012, 1672, | Vals:{{EDOs|836, 1012, 1672, 1848, 2684, 2860, 3696, 4532, 5368}}, ... | ||
=== 11-limit === | ==== 11-limit ==== | ||
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11 | Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11 | ||
Line 301: | Line 301: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.943 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.943 | ||
Vals: 176, 836, 1012, 1672, 1848, 2684, 2860, 3696, 4532... | Vals: {{EDOs|176, 836, 1012, 1672, 1848, 2684, 2860, 3696, 4532}}... | ||
=== 13-limit === | === 13-limit === | ||
Line 312: | Line 312: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.939 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.939 | ||
Vals: 836, 1012f, 1672f, | Vals: {{EDOs|836, 1012f, 1672f, 1848, 2684, 3696f, 4532, 5368, 7216}}... | ||
== 56th-octave temperaments == | == 56th-octave temperaments == |