Xenharmonic Wiki:Things to do: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
Inthar (talk | contribs)
Line 165: Line 165:
It seems the proposal for making the temperament material more accessible has failed. It might be better for pages intended for a general audience to be as isolated as possible from the temperament pages.
It seems the proposal for making the temperament material more accessible has failed. It might be better for pages intended for a general audience to be as isolated as possible from the temperament pages.


'''Proposals:'''  
'''Proposal:''' On a page intended to be read by a general audience and those unfamiliar with RTT, such as pages about MOS patterns,  
# Pages intended to be read by a general audience and those unfamiliar with RTT, such as MOS pages, should not mention a temperament at all, unless the temperament has been used in at least 20 compositions (for example, a 1L6s MOS in a porcupine tuning, or pumps the porcupine comma). Pages on which this temperament restriction policy is active should be clearly marked for editors.
# A temperament should not be mentioned at all, unless the temperament has been used in at least 20 compositions (for example, a 1L6s MOS in a porcupine tuning, or pumps the porcupine comma). Pages on which this temperament restriction policy is active should be clearly marked for editors.
#* When linking to a temperament name, it should link to a page describing the temperament for a general audience, not a technical temperament entry.
# When linking to a temperament name, it should link to a page describing the temperament for a general audience, not a technical temperament entry.
# <s>The same threshold should apply for creating a temperament page.</s>
# <s>The same threshold should apply for creating a temperament page.</s>