Talk:159edo/Notation: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:48, 16 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:33, 27 January 2021 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 220:		Line 220:

	::: Oh, and I should also point out that for EDOs where the rastma is not tempered out, but the half-apotome also exists, (think [[318edo]]) the rastmic accidentals would not be used because 33/32 takes priority, and... well... because the half-apotome is not formed by tempering out the rastma in such EDOs. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 15:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)		::: Oh, and I should also point out that for EDOs where the rastma is not tempered out, but the half-apotome also exists, (think [[318edo]]) the rastmic accidentals would not be used because 33/32 takes priority, and... well... because the half-apotome is not formed by tempering out the rastma in such EDOs. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 15:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

			Hey, Xenwolf, do you think we have time to work on this some more? --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 18:33, 27 January 2021 (UTC)