User talk:FloraC: Difference between revisions

Line 227:

::::: Oh, there's a parameter "legend"? I didn't notice the update. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 11:42, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

:::::: I saw that basically only you are using the template (besides me), and since I also observed that you usually observe the recent changes, I thought that there was no need to tell you about [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Template%3AEDOs&type=revision&diff=53752&oldid=45535 the change]. I also was not totally satisfied with it, I'm still wondering if another parameter name would be better or if adding a "shell template" (like "EDOs2", with the parameter set by default) would ease it's usage in the temperament sections, but all the names I thought of seemed unsatisfying... --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:25, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

:::::: So, what about starting an infobox or infotable for temperaments, a template covering all the aspects? I mean, the content of these sections are highly formalized anyway (although not consistently formatted).

@@ Line 227: / Line 227: @@
 ::::: Oh, there's a parameter "legend"? I didn't notice the update. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 11:42, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
+:::::: I saw that basically only you are using the template (besides me), and since I also observed that you usually observe the recent changes, I thought that there was no need to tell you about [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Template%3AEDOs&type=revision&diff=53752&oldid=45535 the change]. I also was not totally satisfied with it, I'm still wondering if another parameter name would be better or if adding a "shell template" (like "EDOs2", with the parameter set by default) would ease it's usage in the temperament sections, but all the names I thought of seemed unsatisfying... --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:25, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
+:::::: So, what about starting an infobox or infotable for temperaments, a template covering all the aspects? I mean, the content of these sections are highly formalized anyway (although not consistently formatted).