User talk:FloraC: Difference between revisions

Line 188:

: Hmmm, I'm yet to see how 135/112 is a useful interval by itself. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:54, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

:: Funny enough, 135/112 makes for an excellent third for when you wish to use 16/11 as your outside interval. Sure, the result sounds something like a xenharmonic diminished triad, but judging from my experience with music, I'd say there are times when that sort of thing is exactly what you want. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:54, 29 November 2020 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 26,022 edits →Another comma: re ← Older edit		Revision as of 17:44, 29 November 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 6,012 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 188:		Line 188:

	: Hmmm, I'm yet to see how 135/112 is a useful interval by itself. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 07:54, 29 November 2020 (UTC)		: Hmmm, I'm yet to see how 135/112 is a useful interval by itself. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 07:54, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

			:: Funny enough, 135/112 makes for an excellent third for when you wish to use 16/11 as your outside interval. Sure, the result sounds something like a xenharmonic diminished triad, but judging from my experience with music, I'd say there are times when that sort of thing is exactly what you want. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 17:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)