Talk:159edo/Notation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 214: | Line 214: | ||
:::::::::: Done (remember the browser refresh if you don't see any difference) :) the extraction of single glyphs in SVG format will follow tomorrow. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 22:45, 16 October 2020 (UTC) | :::::::::: Done (remember the browser refresh if you don't see any difference) :) the extraction of single glyphs in SVG format will follow tomorrow. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 22:45, 16 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::::::::: Right. | |||
::::::: Oh, and I should have said this earlier, but thank you very much for your help in all of this. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC) | ::::::: Oh, and I should have said this earlier, but thank you very much for your help in all of this. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
::: Oh, and I should also point out that for EDOs where the rastma is not tempered out, but the half-apotome also exists, (think [[318edo]]) the rastmic accidentals would not be used because 33/32 takes priority, and... well... because the half-apotome is not formed by tempering out the rastma in such EDOs. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC) | ::: Oh, and I should also point out that for EDOs where the rastma is not tempered out, but the half-apotome also exists, (think [[318edo]]) the rastmic accidentals would not be used because 33/32 takes priority, and... well... because the half-apotome is not formed by tempering out the rastma in such EDOs. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC) | ||