Talk:159edo/Notation: Difference between revisions

Line 212:

::::::::: Yeah, I think that will work as long as the positioning is right. While you're at it, the strokes of all the demisharp and sesquisharp accidentals should also be fixed to have the same angle and thickness as those of the sharp symbol. Again, thank you very much for taking your time to help me do this. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:33, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::: Done (remember the browser refresh if you don't see any difference) :) the extraction of single glyphs in SVG format will follow tomorrow. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 22:45, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

::::::: Oh, and I should have said this earlier, but thank you very much for your help in all of this. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

::: Oh, and I should also point out that for EDOs where the rastma is not tempered out, but the half-apotome also exists, (think [[318edo]]) the rastmic accidentals would not be used because 33/32 takes priority, and... well... because the half-apotome is not formed by tempering out the rastma in such EDOs. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 212: / Line 212: @@
 ::::::::: Yeah, I think that will work as long as the positioning is right.  While you're at it, the strokes of all the demisharp and sesquisharp accidentals should also be fixed to have the same angle and thickness as those of the sharp symbol.  Again, thank you very much for taking your time to help me do this. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:33, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
+:::::::::: Done (remember the browser refresh if you don't see any difference) :) the extraction of single glyphs in SVG format will follow tomorrow. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 22:45, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 ::::::: Oh, and I should have said this earlier, but thank you very much for your help in all of this. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 ::: Oh, and I should also point out that for EDOs where the rastma is not tempered out, but the half-apotome also exists, (think [[318edo]]) the rastmic accidentals would not be used because 33/32 takes priority, and... well... because the half-apotome is not formed by tempering out the rastma in such EDOs. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)