Talk:159edo/Notation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 201: | Line 201: | ||
:::: When you said "60-degree angles from the vertical" -- did you mean this [[File:Rect949.png|24x24px]]? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 16:44, 16 October 2020 (UTC) | :::: When you said "60-degree angles from the vertical" -- did you mean this [[File:Rect949.png|24x24px]]? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 16:44, 16 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::: I think that works, but the question is whether or not the distinctions still work in the staff context. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC) | ::::: I think that works, but the question is whether or not the distinctions still work in the staff context. Also, the ends of the cross stroke need fixing, but we'll get to that later. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
::: Oh, and I should also point out that for EDOs where the rastma is not tempered out, but the half-apotome also exists, (think [[318edo]]) the rastmic accidentals would not be used because 33/32 takes priority, and... well... because the half-apotome is not formed by tempering out the rastma in such EDOs. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC) | ::: Oh, and I should also point out that for EDOs where the rastma is not tempered out, but the half-apotome also exists, (think [[318edo]]) the rastmic accidentals would not be used because 33/32 takes priority, and... well... because the half-apotome is not formed by tempering out the rastma in such EDOs. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC) | ||