Talk:159edo/Notation: Difference between revisions

Line 199:

::: For the record, if there are issues with the flat accidentls, I'd have to say that the thickness and angle of the extra strokes on the stems of the narrow and wide flat accidentals is most likely to be the problem. Perhaps those cross strokes ought to be thicker and should set at 60-degree angles from the vertical rather than 45-degree angles. The reason I say this is that those extra strokes are what make the extra flat accidentals stand out from one another, while the shape of the rest of the accidental is what makes them recognisable as flats in the first place. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 14:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

::: Oh, and I should also point out that for EDOs where the rastma is not tempered out, but the half-apotome also exists, (think [[318edo]]) the rastmic accidentals would not be used because 33/32 takes priority, and... well... because the half-apotome is not formed by tempering out the rastma. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

::: Oh, and I should also point out that for EDOs where the rastma is not tempered out, but the half-apotome also exists, (think [[318edo]]) the rastmic accidentals would not be used because 33/32 takes priority, and... well... because the half-apotome is not formed by tempering out the rastma in such EDOs. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:26, 16 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:28, 16 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 199:		Line 199:
	::: For the record, if there are issues with the flat accidentls, I'd have to say that the thickness and angle of the extra strokes on the stems of the narrow and wide flat accidentals is most likely to be the problem. Perhaps those cross strokes ought to be thicker and should set at 60-degree angles from the vertical rather than 45-degree angles. The reason I say this is that those extra strokes are what make the extra flat accidentals stand out from one another, while the shape of the rest of the accidental is what makes them recognisable as flats in the first place. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 14:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)		::: For the record, if there are issues with the flat accidentls, I'd have to say that the thickness and angle of the extra strokes on the stems of the narrow and wide flat accidentals is most likely to be the problem. Perhaps those cross strokes ought to be thicker and should set at 60-degree angles from the vertical rather than 45-degree angles. The reason I say this is that those extra strokes are what make the extra flat accidentals stand out from one another, while the shape of the rest of the accidental is what makes them recognisable as flats in the first place. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 14:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

	::: Oh, and I should also point out that for EDOs where the rastma is not tempered out, but the half-apotome also exists, (think [[318edo]]) the rastmic accidentals would not be used because 33/32 takes priority, and... well... because the half-apotome is not formed by tempering out the rastma. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 15:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)		::: Oh, and I should also point out that for EDOs where the rastma is not tempered out, but the half-apotome also exists, (think [[318edo]]) the rastmic accidentals would not be used because 33/32 takes priority, and... well... because the half-apotome is not formed by tempering out the rastma in such EDOs. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 15:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)