Godtone
Joined 17 December 2020
→Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy: new section |
|||
| Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
I've expanded this page a bit and added some more temperaments. This page could be useful, but it seems like no one contributes to it anymore.--[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 22:45, 21 November 2025 (UTC) | I've expanded this page a bit and added some more temperaments. This page could be useful, but it seems like no one contributes to it anymore.--[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 22:45, 21 November 2025 (UTC) | ||
Hey man I noticed your changes in the bird's eye page, I partially reversed them, before we begin an edit war I'd like to give some justifications and also hear your opinion so we can come to a truce: | |||
* Garibaldi is the simplest 7-limit effective extension of schismic: -14 fifths versus -26 fifths in gracecordial or whatver is called (kinda alright but more complex), and -2 fifths in schism (bad and very innacurate extension) | |||
* When I mean bad, I mean ''temperament'' bad. As in high badness. This also makes garibaldi and cassandra the ''best'' compared to helenus and andromeda which are comparatively worse. | |||
* I removed the s-expressions because I believe we don't need them. I don't know the target audience of this, but if it's a less temperament informed reader, the s-expressions will only clutter as the comma ratios or names, whatever is shortest, are already succint. | |||
* I have a huge spot for cassandra and became one with it. Sorry if I come of as defensive or glaze it too much. Can't help myself. | |||
That's all --[[User:Eufalesio|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio|talk]]) 09:48, 7 May 2026 (UTC) | |||