Talk:Meantone family: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 147: | Line 147: | ||
: covers all subranges between 26edo and 12edo with 6 extension pathways. Note that the roulette (31 & 74) and mediantone (74 & 43) extensions to grosstone are very complex ''and not currently documented on the page''. | : covers all subranges between 26edo and 12edo with 6 extension pathways. Note that the roulette (31 & 74) and mediantone (74 & 43) extensions to grosstone are very complex ''and not currently documented on the page''. | ||
: I believe furthermore that 11-limit "meanenneadecal" should be renamed to "vincenzo" (which there is already precedent for, with 2.9.5.7.11 leantone referred to as "every other step of '''vincenzo'''"), and that tridecimal meantone should be decanonicalized (also that 11-limit huygens should be called huygens and not "undecimal meantone"). I don't believe any pathways extending from either flattone or septimal meantone to the 19-limit, other than these 8, are worth preserving. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 06:33, 24 August 2025 (UTC) | : I believe furthermore that 11-limit "meanenneadecal" should be renamed to "vincenzo" (which there is already precedent for, with 2.9.5.7.11 leantone referred to as "every other step of '''vincenzo'''"), and that tridecimal meantone should be decanonicalized (also that 11-limit huygens should be called huygens and not "undecimal meantone"). I don't believe any pathways extending from either flattone or septimal meantone to the 19-limit, other than these 8, are worth preserving. The rationale for preserving vincenzo and tridecimal huygens is that these are the best 19edo-specific and 31edo-specific extensions. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 06:33, 24 August 2025 (UTC) | ||
:: | :: | ||