Talk:159edo/Notation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 200: | Line 200: | ||
:::: When you said "60-degree angles from the vertical" -- did you mean this [[File:Rect949.png|24x24px]]? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 16:44, 16 October 2020 (UTC) | :::: When you said "60-degree angles from the vertical" -- did you mean this [[File:Rect949.png|24x24px]]? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 16:44, 16 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::: I think that works, but the question is whether or not the distinctions still work in the staff context. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
::: Oh, and I should also point out that for EDOs where the rastma is not tempered out, but the half-apotome also exists, (think [[318edo]]) the rastmic accidentals would not be used because 33/32 takes priority, and... well... because the half-apotome is not formed by tempering out the rastma in such EDOs. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC) | ::: Oh, and I should also point out that for EDOs where the rastma is not tempered out, but the half-apotome also exists, (think [[318edo]]) the rastmic accidentals would not be used because 33/32 takes priority, and... well... because the half-apotome is not formed by tempering out the rastma in such EDOs. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC) | ||