6656/6561: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
Bold lemma. Correction (temper -> temper out); -duplicate data |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Comma = yes | | Comma = yes | ||
}} | }} | ||
The [[ | The '''6656/6561''', the '''tetris comma''', is a [[small comma|small]] [[13-limit]] [[comma]]. It is the amount by which [[13/8]] exceeds ([[9/8]])<sup>4</sup>, that is, the [[tetratone]]. | ||
== Temperaments == | == Temperaments == | ||
When tempered, it implies a sharp fifth or a doubly as sharp [[9/8|tone]], and it features as the important comma that reduces rank 3 [[parapythic]] to [[#No-5's leapday|no-5's leapday]], which is notable as having much lower [[badness]], as discussed there on this page. | When [[tempering out|tempered out]], it implies a sharp fifth or a doubly as sharp [[9/8|tone]], and it features as the important comma that reduces rank-3 [[parapythic]] to [[#No-5's leapday|no-5's leapday]], which is notable as having much lower [[badness]], as discussed there on this page. | ||
=== Tetris === | === Tetris === | ||
If tempered only on the 2.3.13 subgroup, you get tetris. [[17edo]] is a tone-efficient tetris tuning, though it is significantly sharper than ideal, as ideally you want [[13/8]] to be tuned flat so that the fifths need not be sharpened more than actually necessary for the equivalence. Nonetheless, [[34edo]] may be of interest for extending the subgroup so as to find more 13-limit harmonies than present in 17edo, though 17edo does reasonably well enough with the 2.3.13 subgroup alone, as it has an accurate [[~]][[13/9]] and still good [[~]][[13/12]]. By contrast, [[29edo]] is close to the just-3's tuning, still tempering the fifth in the right direction (as contrasted to 12edo) but with virtually all the error on 13 at 13{{cent}} flat. Therefore through the addition of [[val]]s we can deduce that the smallest reasonably optimized tuning is | If tempered out only on the 2.3.13 subgroup, you get tetris. [[17edo]] is a tone-efficient tetris tuning, though it is significantly sharper than ideal, as ideally you want [[13/8]] to be tuned flat so that the fifths need not be sharpened more than actually necessary for the equivalence. Nonetheless, [[34edo]] may be of interest for extending the subgroup so as to find more 13-limit harmonies than present in 17edo, though 17edo does reasonably well enough with the 2.3.13 subgroup alone, as it has an accurate [[~]][[13/9]] and still good [[~]][[13/12]]. By contrast, [[29edo]] is close to the just-3's tuning, still tempering the fifth in the right direction (as contrasted to 12edo) but with virtually all the error on 13 at 13{{cent}} flat. Therefore through the addition of [[val]]s we can deduce that the smallest reasonably optimized tuning is [[46edo]] since 17 + 29 = 46, which we can verify has a sharp 3 and a flat 13, so fits our basic requirements, though interestingly this does not appear in the optimal ET sequence here. Notably tetris prefers sharper tunings of the fifth than the related [[leapfrog]] temperament; this corresponds to having larger edos in the [[optimal ET sequence]]. Perhaps more amazingly is that adding all primes except 5 through parapythic results in a temperament with even lower badness than the pure 2.3.13 version. | ||
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.13 | [[Subgroup]]: 2.3.13 | ||
{{ | {{Mapping|legend=1| 1 0 -9 | 0 1 8 }} | ||
: mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~13 | : mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~13 | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): 2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.822 | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.822 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 5, 12, 17, 63, 80, 97, 114, 131, 245b }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 5, 12, 17, 63, 80, 97, 114, 131, 245b }} | ||
| Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
Badness (Dirichlet): 0.522 | Badness (Dirichlet): 0.522 | ||
== | == Etymology == | ||
This comma was named by [[User:Godtone|Godtone]] in 2024 as a contraction of "tetratone" and "tridecimal". | |||