256/255: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

23 April 2025

21 April 2025

  • curprev 08:5608:56, 21 April 2025 FloraC talk contribs 4,826 bytes −173 As I said, char has a lower accuracy that is more associated with 120/119 than with this comma. If that temp should make this a char comma then it'd also make the marvel comma a char comma

20 April 2025

19 April 2025

13 April 2025

16 November 2024

22 September 2024

24 June 2024

  • curprev 07:3907:39, 24 June 2024 FloraC talk contribs 4,228 bytes −244 Whatever added here isn't characteristic of 256/255 esp. if it's an adjacent square-superparticular. Even {S16, S18} is more deserving of its own subsection like charic and charismic. Remove the "because" paragraph to avoid implying causal relationship.

23 June 2024

  • curprev 20:4320:43, 23 June 2024 Godtone talk contribs 4,472 bytes +535 this is a silly reason, it's clear to any1 working with the commas (& more clear if we use S-expression notation, so i've added that to clarify, altho it was already present) that there is more damage implied, but srutal archagall is notable as being the way of making diaschismic much more accurate and interesting and giving it more interpretations, & it's natural to see it at least mentioned here; i avoided for 289/288 cuz it's more debatable there, but even then its omission feels out of place Tag: Undo

12 March 2024

27 January 2024

16 January 2024

15 January 2024

9 January 2024

6 January 2024

28 July 2023

21 July 2023

11 January 2023

29 December 2022

25 October 2022

20 March 2022

29 December 2020