User talk:Aura: Difference between revisions

Line 209:

== Aura's Diatonic Scales: naming fix ==

Dawson, I think the mode naming for the Mixolydian scale needs to be fixed: the adjective ~~“Mixic”~~ should be replaced with “Myxolydic”. This way, this adjective will be consistent with your naming schema, in particular, with “Lydic”. — [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], ''Sunday 2021 February 14, 17:49 UTC''

Dawson, I think the mode naming for the Mixolydian scale needs to be fixed: the adjective “Myxic” should be replaced with “Myxolydic”. This way, this adjective will be consistent with your naming schema, in particular, with “Lydic”. — [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], ''Sunday 2021 February 14, 17:49 UTC''

Revision as of 17:49, 14 February 2021 view source SAKryukov (talk \| contribs) 648 edits →Aura's Diatonic Scales: naming fix: new section ← Older edit		Revision as of 17:50, 14 February 2021 view source SAKryukov (talk \| contribs) 648 edits Myxic to fix Newer edit →
Line 209:		Line 209:
	== Aura's Diatonic Scales: naming fix ==		== Aura's Diatonic Scales: naming fix ==

	Dawson, I think the mode naming for the Mixolydian scale needs to be fixed: the adjective ~~“Mixic”~~ should be replaced with “Myxolydic”. This way, this adjective will be consistent with your naming schema, in particular, with “Lydic”. — [[User:SAKryukov\|SA]], ''Sunday 2021 February 14, 17:49 UTC''		Dawson, I think the mode naming for the Mixolydian scale needs to be fixed: the adjective “Myxic” should be replaced with “Myxolydic”. This way, this adjective will be consistent with your naming schema, in particular, with “Lydic”. — [[User:SAKryukov\|SA]], ''Sunday 2021 February 14, 17:49 UTC''