Lhearne
Joined 28 January 2021
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 171: | Line 171: | ||
:: I certainly like the development for "O" in particular, though I'll also give "Q" a pass on this one because of the degree of uncertainty stemming from the exact nature of 7/4 in the first place. However, I do have very serious doubts about the likelihood of M1 and m8 ever being accepted. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 23:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC) | :: I certainly like the development for "O" in particular, though I'll also give "Q" a pass on this one because of the degree of uncertainty stemming from the exact nature of 7/4 in the first place. However, I do have very serious doubts about the likelihood of M1 and m8 ever being accepted. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 23:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC) | ||
:: Now that I think about it, the Pentacircle comma (896/891) can also be given a pass for much the same reason as "Q", though in this case, I think I'd prefer a different letter from "L" | :: Now that I think about it, the Pentacircle comma (896/891) can also be given a pass for much the same reason as "Q", though in this case, I think I'd prefer a different letter from "L" just in case it turns out that we actually need "large/little" to refer to the Paramajor and Paraminor intervals due to the apotome and the parapotome not being the same size. With this in mind, we need a more creative way of capturing what the pentacircle comma is. Since "W" has been freed up, and since "whopper" and "weeny"- meaning "large" and "small" respectively- both start with "W", why not take advantage of this? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 23:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC) |