Template talk:Infobox ET: Difference between revisions

Line 131:

:::::: I can't find your formula in the link. Is it the edostep ratio of the m2 to the A1? --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 02:45, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

::::::: It must be m2 to A1. But let's get down to the details. (1) Should the term be ''semitone ratio'' since it's of two semitones? (2) Should we ever reduce the ratio? (I guess not.) (3) A1 to m2, or m2 to A1? Btw, the just value is 1.26001... or 0.79364..., respectively. A new page is necessary if we use this neologism. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

: I added M2, m2 and A1 to the template. (Hopefully I did it right, I'm new at editing templates.) I saw that for multi-ring edos, the fifth field should include any lower edo with the same fifth. For example 24edo has "12edo" in the fifth parameter. This makes the Rings parameter unnecessary, so I no longer think it should be included. Rather than seeing 24edo and 2 rings and deducing that 24-edo's fifth is 12-edo's fifth, you can see it directly, much better. Related, I now think prime factorization should be included.

Line 139:

Line 141:

: Can we all agree that the template should only be for those things that are indisputable facts? Or if we can't all agree, can we at least agree that we won't reach consensus on including those parameters, and the right course of action is to delete them? --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 02:45, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

:: I suppose the M2/m2/A1 stuff should be ''one'' parameter, not ''three''. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 131: / Line 131: @@
 :::::: I can't find your formula in the link. Is it the edostep ratio of the m2 to the A1? --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 02:45, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
+::::::: It must be m2 to A1. But let's get down to the details. (1) Should the term be ''semitone ratio'' since it's of two semitones? (2) Should we ever reduce the ratio? (I guess not.) (3) A1 to m2, or m2 to A1? Btw, the just value is 1.26001... or 0.79364..., respectively. A new page is necessary if we use this neologism. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 : I added M2, m2 and A1 to the template. (Hopefully I did it right, I'm new at editing templates.) I saw that for multi-ring edos, the fifth field should include any lower edo with the same fifth. For example 24edo has "12edo" in the fifth parameter. This makes the Rings parameter unnecessary, so I no longer think it should be included. Rather than seeing 24edo and 2 rings and deducing that 24-edo's fifth is 12-edo's fifth, you can see it directly, much better. Related, I now think prime factorization should be included.
@@ Line 139: / Line 141: @@
 : Can we all agree that the template should only be for those things that are indisputable facts? Or if we can't all agree, can we at least agree that we won't reach consensus on including those parameters, and the right course of action is to delete them? --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 02:45, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
+:: I suppose the M2/m2/A1 stuff should be ''one'' parameter, not ''three''. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)