User talk:SAKryukov: Difference between revisions

Line 480:

:::::::::::::::::::::::::: Well, "concordance" (as mentioned in the harmonic entropy article) is one example. Another example can be derived from the fact that 7/5 is a concordant interval, yet, [[10/7]]- 7/5's more discordant [[octave complement]]- is also considered "consonant", but this consonance is clearly of a different variety from "concordance"- I'd term 10/7's type of consonance "inverse concordance", at least until we can think up a better name. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:13, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::::::::::::::::::: Oh, and remember what I was talking about when I mentioned "connectivity" before? Basically, "connectivity"- for lack of a better term at the moment- is the type of "consonance" that only exists between a given pitch and ~~members of~~ that pitch's overtone series and undertone series. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::::::::::::::::::: Oh, and remember what I was talking about when I mentioned "connectivity" before? Basically, "connectivity"- for lack of a better term at the moment- is the type of "consonance" that only exists between a given pitch class and other pitch classes that are genrated by the first pitch class's overtone series and undertone series. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::::::::::::::::: I think I know one of the problems we're having- the fact is that differing fields of study use the same words in different ways and with different meanings. That might be contributing to our communication issues just between the two of us. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 23:46, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 480: / Line 480: @@
 :::::::::::::::::::::::::: Well, "concordance" (as mentioned in the harmonic entropy article) is one example.  Another example can be derived from the fact that 7/5 is a concordant interval, yet, [[10/7]]- 7/5's more discordant [[octave complement]]- is also considered "consonant", but this consonance is clearly of a different variety from "concordance"- I'd term 10/7's type of consonance "inverse concordance", at least until we can think up a better name. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:13, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
-:::::::::::::::::::::::::: Oh, and remember what I was talking about when I mentioned "connectivity" before?  Basically, "connectivity"- for lack of a better term at the moment- is the type of "consonance" that only exists between a given pitch and members of that pitch's overtone series and undertone series. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
+:::::::::::::::::::::::::: Oh, and remember what I was talking about when I mentioned "connectivity" before?  Basically, "connectivity"- for lack of a better term at the moment- is the type of "consonance" that only exists between a given pitch class and other pitch classes that are genrated by the first pitch class's overtone series and undertone series. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 :::::::::::::::::::::::: I think I know one of the problems we're having- the fact is that differing fields of study use the same words in different ways and with different meanings.  That might be contributing to our communication issues just between the two of us. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 23:46, 7 December 2020 (UTC)