User talk:Aura: Difference between revisions

Line 187:

::::: Hmm... if it is wider, then that would mean I accidentally made a typo when tweaking the A for the second interval in the file- lowering the A by 15.65 cents instead. My bad. My main concern however, is whether or not the fundamental of the 27/16 can be heard at all. I mean, I'm hearing what sounds like the virtual fundamental's 10th and 11th harmonics... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

::::: No it isn't wider. My version sounds exactly as yours. In my opinion it's the effect that small intervals seem to grow if you concentrate on hearing them, they seem to develop a kind of leading-tone property. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 23:08, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

:::::: No it isn't wider. My version sounds exactly as yours. In my opinion it's the effect that small intervals seem to grow if you concentrate on hearing them, they seem to develop a kind of leading-tone property. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 23:08, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

::::::: That makes sense. I'd wager that 81/80 ''does'' have a kind of leading-tone property, but it's a really tense kind of tense and disconnected leading-tone property as opposed to the more lax and harmonically-connected leading-tone property of an interval like 16/15. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 23:19, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

::: Another strange thing I found out is that, according to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_fundamental Wikipedia's article on the subject], apparently not everyone can hear the virtual fundamental. -[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

:::: Maybe the effect is to small with only two partials? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 22:30, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 187: / Line 187: @@
 ::::: Hmm... if it is wider, then that would mean I accidentally made a typo when tweaking the A for the second interval in the file- lowering the A by 15.65 cents instead.  My bad.  My main concern however, is whether or not the fundamental of the 27/16 can be heard at all.  I mean, I'm hearing what sounds like the virtual fundamental's 10th and 11th harmonics... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
-::::: No it isn't wider. My version sounds exactly as yours. In my opinion it's the effect that small intervals seem to grow if you concentrate on hearing them, they seem to develop a kind of leading-tone property. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 23:08, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
+:::::: No it isn't wider. My version sounds exactly as yours. In my opinion it's the effect that small intervals seem to grow if you concentrate on hearing them, they seem to develop a kind of leading-tone property. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 23:08, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
+::::::: That makes sense.  I'd wager that 81/80 ''does'' have a kind of leading-tone property, but it's a really tense kind of tense and disconnected leading-tone property as opposed to the more lax and harmonically-connected leading-tone property of an interval like 16/15. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 23:19, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 ::: Another strange thing I found out is that, according to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_fundamental Wikipedia's article on the subject], apparently not everyone can hear the virtual fundamental. -[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 :::: Maybe the effect is to small with only two partials? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 22:30, 6 December 2020 (UTC)