User talk:Xenwolf: Difference between revisions

Line 215:

== MOS scales of various EDOs ==

Hey, Xenwolf, since 159edo now has its own category, should we add [[79MOS 159edo]] to said category? To be fair, I'm also proposing that we link [[31edo MOS scales~~]] to [[31edo~~]] under Category:31edo in the same way, and that we do the same for other edos and their MOS scales. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 18:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Hey, Xenwolf, since 159edo now has its own category, should we add [[79MOS 159edo]] to said category? To be fair, I'm also proposing that we link [[31edo MOS scales]] under Category:31edo in the same way, and that we do the same for other edos and their MOS scales. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 18:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:18, 2 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:19, 2 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 215:		Line 215:

	== MOS scales of various EDOs ==		== MOS scales of various EDOs ==
	Hey, Xenwolf, since 159edo now has its own category, should we add [[79MOS 159edo]] to said category? To be fair, I'm also proposing that we link [[31edo MOS scales~~]] to [[31edo~~]] under Category:31edo in the same way, and that we do the same for other edos and their MOS scales. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 18:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)		Hey, Xenwolf, since 159edo now has its own category, should we add [[79MOS 159edo]] to said category? To be fair, I'm also proposing that we link [[31edo MOS scales]] under Category:31edo in the same way, and that we do the same for other edos and their MOS scales. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 18:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)