Lifthrasirsma: Difference between revisions

BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Update data
 
Line 6: Line 6:
| Comma = yes
| Comma = yes
}}
}}
The '''lifthrasirsma''' ({{monzo|legend=1| 29 -11 -2 0 -2 }}, [[ratio]]: 536870912/535869675) is an [[Unnoticeable comma|unnoticeable]] [[11-limit]] (also 2.3.5.11 [[subgroup]]) [[comma]] measuring about 3.23 [[cent]]s. It marks the difference between the [[rastma]] and a stack of two [[schisma]]s.  
The '''lifthrasirsma''' ({{monzo|legend=1| 29 -11 -2 0 -2 }}, [[ratio]]: 536870912/535869675) is an [[unnoticeable comma|unnoticeable]] [[11-limit]] (also [[2.3.5.11 subgroup|2.3.5.11-]][[subgroup]]) [[comma]] measuring about 3.23 [[cent]]s. It marks the difference between the [[rastma]] and a stack of two [[schisma]]s.  


== Temperaments ==
== Temperaments ==
Line 18: Line 18:
Comma list: 536870912/535869675
Comma list: 536870912/535869675


Sval mapping: {{mapping| 1 1 0 9 | 0 2 0 -11 | 0 0 1 -1 }}
Subgroup-val mapping: {{mapping| 1 1 0 9 | 0 2 0 -11 | 0 0 1 -1 }}


Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~16384/13365 = 351.0971, ~5/4 = 386.4070
Optimal tunings:
* WE: ~2 = 1199.9228{{c}}, ~16384/13365 = 351.0529{{c}}, ~5/4 = 386.4968{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~16384/13365 = 351.0805{{c}}, ~5/4 = 386.4947{{c}}


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 17, 24, 41, 65, 205, 270, 335, 581, 605, 646, 916, 981, 2878e, 3859bcee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17, 24, 41, 65, 205, 270, 335, 581, 605, 646, 916, 981, 2878e, 3859bcee }}


Badness: 0.542 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness (Sintel): 4.48


==== 2.3.5.11.19 subgroup ====
==== 2.3.5.11.19 subgroup ====
Line 31: Line 33:
Comma list: 1216/1215, 131072/131043
Comma list: 1216/1215, 131072/131043


Sval mapping: {{mapping| 1 1 0 9 -1 | 0 2 0 -11 10 | 0 0 1 -1 1 }}
Subgroup-val mapping: {{mapping| 1 1 0 9 -1 | 0 2 0 -11 10 | 0 0 1 -1 1 }}


Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~256/209 = 351.1010, ~5/4 = 386.4125
Optimal tunings:
* WE: ~2 = 1199.9494{{c}}, ~256/209 = 351.0800{{c}}, ~5/4 = 386.4828{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~256/209 = 351.0960{{c}}, ~5/4 = 386.4831{{c}}


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 17, 24, 41, 65, 181, 205, 270, 581, 646, 851, 916, 1186, 2102 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17, 24, 41, 65, 181, 205, 270, 581, 646, 851, 916, 1186, 2102 }}


Badness: 0.260 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness (Sintel): 0.581


== Etymology ==
== Etymology ==