Godtone
Joined 17 December 2020
→Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy: new section |
|||
| Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
: <nowiki>*</nowiki> Re: "pretty certain", initially I was completely certain, hence the boldness of my edit cuz it seemed like a very unambiguous and significant improvement, but the consideration about 3''n'' + 2 maybe being a little more work than is reasonable to ask of the user makes me unsure given I haven't seen what the continuum looks like if we apply this transformation. The alternative transformation would have dicot at 2, magic at 5, mutt at 7, würschmidt at 8, etc. but already we see this might not be desirable because the info that mutt splits something (the octave and the diesis) into 3 is lost. | : <nowiki>*</nowiki> Re: "pretty certain", initially I was completely certain, hence the boldness of my edit cuz it seemed like a very unambiguous and significant improvement, but the consideration about 3''n'' + 2 maybe being a little more work than is reasonable to ask of the user makes me unsure given I haven't seen what the continuum looks like if we apply this transformation. The alternative transformation would have dicot at 2, magic at 5, mutt at 7, würschmidt at 8, etc. but already we see this might not be desirable because the info that mutt splits something (the octave and the diesis) into 3 is lost. | ||
== [[Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy]] == | |||
I've expanded this page a bit and added some more temperaments. This page could be useful, but it seems like no one contributes to it anymore.--[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 22:45, 21 November 2025 (UTC) | |||