User talk:Godtone: Difference between revisions

Line 86:

:::: I think it's that you compare the given EDO ''to'' a range of EDOs. This was not clear (from my POV). I have tried to increase readability by placing the information regarding context at the beginning of the sentence. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:23, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

== Comma name proposal for 256/255: "charisma" vs "charsma" ==

Hi Godtone,

I never accept your name proposal for [[256/255]] ("charisma" and "charismic", formerly used for [[Magic family #Horcrux|horcrux extensions]]), but its associated temperament name "charic" (2.3.5.17 subgroup rank-3). For disambiguation, 256/255 should be renamed "char comma", "charic comma" or "charsma" (no-''i'' spelling). Then its associated temperament name for full 17-limit rank-6 would be called "charsmic". Do you deal it? --[[User:Xenllium|Xenllium]] ([[User talk:Xenllium|talk]]) 10:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

@@ Line 86: / Line 86: @@
 :::: I think it's that you compare the given EDO ''to'' a range of EDOs. This was not clear (from my POV). I have tried to increase readability by placing the information regarding context at the beginning of the sentence. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:23, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
+== Comma name proposal for 256/255: "charisma" vs "charsma" ==
+Hi Godtone,
+I never accept your name proposal for [[256/255]] ("charisma" and "charismic", formerly used for [[Magic family #Horcrux|horcrux extensions]]), but its associated temperament name "charic" (2.3.5.17 subgroup rank-3). For disambiguation, 256/255 should be renamed "char comma", "charic comma" or "charsma" (no-''i'' spelling). Then its associated temperament name for full 17-limit rank-6 would be called "charsmic". Do you deal it? --[[User:Xenllium|Xenllium]] ([[User talk:Xenllium|talk]]) 10:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)