Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
Line 160: Line 160:


I sometimes think of breaking apart the collections of temperaments in favor to building categories of pages each dedicated to a single temperament. This way, it would be possible to have some temperaments belong to different collections. You are seemingly more familiar with the temperaments, what do you think about my idea? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:28, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
I sometimes think of breaking apart the collections of temperaments in favor to building categories of pages each dedicated to a single temperament. This way, it would be possible to have some temperaments belong to different collections. You are seemingly more familiar with the temperaments, what do you think about my idea? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:28, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
: I'm not sure about the detail. Currently some temperaments has got their own dedicated pages (such as ''meantone''), and some not. Meanwhile the "data" are in collection pages (such as ''meantone family''). Do you mean each entry of "data" in the collection pages should be moved to their respective dedicated pages, and only links should remain there?