User talk:SAKryukov: Difference between revisions

Line 430:

:::::::::::: [[File:Interval_Test.mp3]]

::::::::::::: Thank you very much, but you see, it may sound surprising, but I cannot hear much in these settings. To grasp it, I'll need to play it by myself. This is fairly simple. Let me give you an example and list some missing points. First, when you say "contains two chords consisting of C7, E7, G7 and A7", it may mean two "complex chords", such as first, C7+ E7 and second, G7+A7, or something else. When you name chords, I don't care about some detail, but need to know, which~~, say~~ C7, in what tonal system. Usually, people using this notation assume 12-EDO. When you say "flattened" or "sharpened", I would need to know which degrees are changed. Even better to give not cent notation, but directly rational-number notation. This is one intentionally simplified example: you say "play C6 as 1, 5/4, 3/2, 5/3 followed by C6 as 1, 5/4, 3/2, 27/16, hear the difference" with your comment on what "weakens tone stability" and other function-related comments. With EDO, you could use the terms such as 12-EDO 3rd, 12-EDO 6th, possibly with ♯/♭. With other EDOs, ♯/♭ are ambiguous, so I add the number of microtones relative to the degree, such as: "41-EDO ♯2 6th". Then I'll easily play absolutely anything, no matter what you specify. — [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], ''Monday 2020 December 7, 00:39 UTC''

::::::::::::: Thank you very much, but you see, it may sound surprising, but I cannot hear much in these settings. To grasp it, I'll need to play it by myself. This is fairly simple. Let me give you an example and list some missing points. First, when you say "contains two chords consisting of C7, E7, G7 and A7", it may mean two "complex chords", such as first, C7+ E7 and second, G7+A7, or something else. When you name chords, I don't care about some detail, but need to know: which C7? in what tonal system? Usually, people using this notation assume 12-EDO. When you say "flattened" or "sharpened", I would need to know which degrees are changed. Even better to give not cent notation, but directly rational-number notation. This is one intentionally simplified example: you say "play C6 as 1, 5/4, 3/2, 5/3 followed by C6 as 1, 5/4, 3/2, 27/16, hear the difference" with your comment on what "weakens tone stability" and other function-related comments. With EDO, you could use the terms such as 12-EDO 3rd, 12-EDO 6th, possibly with ♯/♭. With other EDOs, ♯/♭ are ambiguous, so I add the number of microtones relative to the degree, such as: "41-EDO ♯2 6th". Then I'll easily play absolutely anything, no matter what you specify. — [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], ''Monday 2020 December 7, 00:39 UTC''

::::::::::::: By the way, do you really still use MP3?! It is not just obsolete, it is stone age, with ridiculous quality and compression. Top Web standard is .opus, is supported by everything. Probably, MP3 is alive only due to the existence of the devices like car audio — nothing is so conservative as those weird people designing such devices. :-)

@@ Line 430: / Line 430: @@
 :::::::::::: [[File:Interval_Test.mp3]]
-::::::::::::: Thank you very much, but you see, it may sound surprising, but I cannot hear much in these settings. To grasp it, I'll need to play it by myself. This is fairly simple. Let me give you an example and list some missing points. First, when you say "contains two chords consisting of C7, E7, G7 and A7", it may mean two "complex chords", such as first, C7+ E7 and second, G7+A7, or something else. When you name chords, I don't care about some detail, but need to know, which, say C7, in what tonal system. Usually, people using this notation assume 12-EDO. When you say "flattened" or "sharpened", I would need to know which degrees are changed. Even better to give not cent notation, but directly rational-number notation. This is one intentionally simplified example: you say "play C6 as 1, 5/4, 3/2, 5/3 followed by C6 as 1, 5/4, 3/2, 27/16, hear the difference" with your comment on what "weakens tone stability" and other function-related comments. With EDO, you could use the terms such as 12-EDO 3rd, 12-EDO 6th, possibly with ♯/♭. With other EDOs, ♯/♭ are ambiguous, so I add the number of microtones relative to the degree, such as: "41-EDO ♯2 6th". Then I'll easily play absolutely anything, no matter what you specify. &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:SAKryukov|SA]],&nbsp;''Monday&nbsp;2020&nbsp;December&nbsp;7,&nbsp;00:39&nbsp;UTC''
+::::::::::::: Thank you very much, but you see, it may sound surprising, but I cannot hear much in these settings. To grasp it, I'll need to play it by myself. This is fairly simple. Let me give you an example and list some missing points. First, when you say "contains two chords consisting of C7, E7, G7 and A7", it may mean two "complex chords", such as first, C7+ E7 and second, G7+A7, or something else. When you name chords, I don't care about some detail, but need to know: which C7? in what tonal system? Usually, people using this notation assume 12-EDO. When you say "flattened" or "sharpened", I would need to know which degrees are changed. Even better to give not cent notation, but directly rational-number notation. This is one intentionally simplified example: you say "play C6 as 1, 5/4, 3/2, 5/3 followed by C6 as 1, 5/4, 3/2, 27/16, hear the difference" with your comment on what "weakens tone stability" and other function-related comments. With EDO, you could use the terms such as 12-EDO 3rd, 12-EDO 6th, possibly with ♯/♭. With other EDOs, ♯/♭ are ambiguous, so I add the number of microtones relative to the degree, such as: "41-EDO ♯2 6th". Then I'll easily play absolutely anything, no matter what you specify. &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:SAKryukov|SA]],&nbsp;''Monday&nbsp;2020&nbsp;December&nbsp;7,&nbsp;00:39&nbsp;UTC''
 ::::::::::::: By the way, do you really still use MP3?! It is not just obsolete, it is stone age, with ridiculous quality and compression. Top Web standard is .opus, is supported by everything. Probably, MP3 is alive only due to the existence of the devices like car audio — nothing is so conservative as those weird people designing such devices. :-)