User talk:Xenwolf: Difference between revisions

Line 201:

:: Hmm... I have to admit we need a good name for the 693/676 comma... Wait- this is no comma... it has a value of about 42.9985270 cents! --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 20:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

:: Yeah, calling 693/676 a "comma" is a bad idea... I mean, the idea of 33/32 being called a "comma" already bugs me considering it's a very useful quartertone, not something we want to try and temper out- unless of course we're talking about EDOs like 12edo or something... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 20:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:36, 21 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:41, 21 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 201:		Line 201:

	:: Hmm... I have to admit we need a good name for the 693/676 comma... Wait- this is no comma... it has a value of about 42.9985270 cents! --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 20:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)		:: Hmm... I have to admit we need a good name for the 693/676 comma... Wait- this is no comma... it has a value of about 42.9985270 cents! --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 20:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

			:: Yeah, calling 693/676 a "comma" is a bad idea... I mean, the idea of 33/32 being called a "comma" already bugs me considering it's a very useful quartertone, not something we want to try and temper out- unless of course we're talking about EDOs like 12edo or something... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 20:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)