Talk:5120/5103: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 12:27, 16 February 2026 view source Godtone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 2,411 edits m suggestion ← Older edit		Revision as of 05:34, 17 February 2026 view source Tristanbay (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 842 edits →"Universal" name for 5120/5103 Newer edit →
Line 44:		Line 44:

	: Why not [[64/63\|S8]]/[[81/80\|S9]]? Are there many properties of this comma that aren't explained by it being ((8/7)/(9/8)) / ((9/8)/(10/9)) = (64/63) / (81/80) and hence ([[10/7]])/([[9/8]])<sup>3</sup>? --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 12:27, 16 February 2026 (UTC)		: Why not [[64/63\|S8]]/[[81/80\|S9]]? Are there many properties of this comma that aren't explained by it being ((8/7)/(9/8)) / ((9/8)/(10/9)) = (64/63) / (81/80) and hence ([[10/7]])/([[9/8]])<sup>3</sup>? --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 12:27, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

			:: Because "ess eight over ess nine" is too many syllables. [[User:Tristanbay\|Tristanbay]] ([[User talk:Tristanbay\|talk]]) 05:34, 17 February 2026 (UTC)