Talk:256/255: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 17:09, 29 December 2023 view source Godtone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 2,289 edits mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 17:22, 29 December 2023 view source Godtone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 2,289 edits mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 29:		Line 29:
	: While y'all are talking over it, I should notify you that "charisma" was from Graham Breed in 2011: [https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning-math/topicId_19166.html Yahoo! Tuning Group \| ''A rose by any other name . . .'']. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 14:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)		: While y'all are talking over it, I should notify you that "charisma" was from Graham Breed in 2011: [https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning-math/topicId_19166.html Yahoo! Tuning Group \| ''A rose by any other name . . .'']. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 14:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

	: ~~A minor~~ point in favour of the name change: currently the 2.3.5.17-subgroup rank 3 temperament associated with [[256/255]] has not been named, but presumably would be called "diasemic" under the current naming, causing yet more potential confusion with [[diasem]]. --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 17:08, 29 December 2023 (UTC)		: An extra point in favour of the name change: currently the 2.3.5.17-subgroup rank 3 temperament associated with [[256/255]] has not been named, but presumably would be called "diasemic" under the current naming, causing yet more potential confusion with [[diasem]]. --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 17:08, 29 December 2023 (UTC)