Minortonic family: Difference between revisions

Name conflict has been resolved. Update keys
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 10: Line 10:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.466
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.466


{{Val list|legend=1| 46, 125, 171, 388, 559, 730, 1289, 2019, 2749, 4768, 16323, 21091 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 46, 125, 171, 388, 559, 730, 1289, 2019, 2749, 4768, 16323, 21091 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.029765
[[Badness]]: 0.029765
Line 29: Line 29:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.458
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.458


{{Val list|legend=1| 46, 125, 171, 1927d, 2098d, …, 3637bcdd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 46, 125, 171, 1927d, 2098d, …, 3637bcdd }}


[[Badness]]: 0.025184
[[Badness]]: 0.025184
Line 44: Line 44:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.482
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.482


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 46, 125e, 171, 217, 605ee, 822dee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 46, 125e, 171, 217, 605ee, 822dee }}


Badness: 0.059060
Badness: 0.059060
Line 57: Line 57:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.481
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.481


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 46, 125e, 171, 217, 605ee, 822dee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 46, 125e, 171, 217, 605ee, 822dee }}


Badness: 0.033140
Badness: 0.033140
Line 70: Line 70:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.481
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.481


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 46, 125e, 171, 217, 605ee, 822dee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 46, 125e, 171, 217, 605ee, 822dee }}


Badness: 0.019792
Badness: 0.019792
Line 85: Line 85:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.449
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.449


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 46, 125, 171e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 46, 125, 171e }}


Badness: 0.053662
Badness: 0.053662
Line 98: Line 98:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.470
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.470


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 46, 125, 171e, 388ee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 46, 125, 171e, 388ee }}


Badness: 0.046170
Badness: 0.046170
Line 111: Line 111:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.471
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.471


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 46, 125, 171e, 388ee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 46, 125, 171e, 388ee }}


Badness: 0.028423
Badness: 0.028423
Line 126: Line 126:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.437
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.437


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 46, 79, 125f, 171ef, 296eff }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 46, 79, 125f, 171ef, 296eff }}


Badness: 0.039302
Badness: 0.039302
Line 139: Line 139:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.444
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.444


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 46, 125f, 171ef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 46, 125f, 171ef }}


Badness: 0.027440
Badness: 0.027440
Line 152: Line 152:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.457
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 182.457


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 46, 204c, 250, 296, 342 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 46, 204c, 250, 296, 342 }}


Badness: 0.026808
Badness: 0.026808
Line 169: Line 169:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~10/9 = 182.467
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~10/9 = 182.467


{{Val list|legend=1| 171, 1164, 1335, 1506, 1677, 1848, 2019, 11943, 13962, 15981, 18000, 20019, 22038 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 171, 1164, 1335, 1506, 1677, 1848, 2019, 11943, 13962, 15981, 18000, 20019, 22038 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.013979
[[Badness]]: 0.013979