Talk:IFDO: Difference between revisions
CompactStar (talk | contribs) |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 465: | Line 465: | ||
:::: First things first though... let's clean up what we've got out there already. Let me know if my plan basically makes sense to y'all too, or else I'll just keep an eye out for your changes to pages. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:32, 10 April 2023 (UTC) | :::: First things first though... let's clean up what we've got out there already. Let me know if my plan basically makes sense to y'all too, or else I'll just keep an eye out for your changes to pages. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:32, 10 April 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::: Couple quick things. | |||
:::: Previously I had requested that Flora and CompactStar's system be deprioritized relative to the one from me, Paul, and Billy, e.g. that the redirects should be altered so that AFDO redirects to ODO and on those pages the bold term ODO given first before AFDO, etc.; I no longer think this. If Flora and CompactStar are the ones exploring these tunings first, they should do it however they like. So I retract that request and apologize for making it before I understood the whole situation well enough. | |||
:::: Also, I have some more info on GPS. Here's a table: | |||
:::: {| class="wikitable" | |||
|+ | |||
!step | |||
!AFS | |||
!APS / GFS | |||
!ALS / IFS | |||
!GPS | |||
|- | |||
!0 | |||
|440. | |||
|440. | |||
|440. | |||
|440. | |||
|- | |||
!1 | |||
|550. | |||
|493.88 | |||
|469.33 | |||
|451.4 | |||
|- | |||
!2 | |||
|660. | |||
|554.37 | |||
|502.86 | |||
|466.06 | |||
|- | |||
!3 | |||
|770. | |||
|622.25 | |||
|541.54 | |||
|485.06 | |||
|- | |||
!4 | |||
|880. | |||
|698.46 | |||
|586.67 | |||
|509.9 | |||
|- | |||
!5 | |||
|990. | |||
|783.99 | |||
|640. | |||
|542.76 | |||
|- | |||
!6 | |||
|1100. | |||
|880. | |||
|704. | |||
|586.81 | |||
|- | |||
!7 | |||
|1210. | |||
|987.77 | |||
|782.22 | |||
|646.94 | |||
|- | |||
!8 | |||
|1320. | |||
|1108.73 | |||
|880. | |||
|730.85 | |||
|- | |||
!9 | |||
|1430. | |||
|1244.51 | |||
|1005.71 | |||
|851.19 | |||
|- | |||
!10 | |||
|1540. | |||
|1396.91 | |||
|1173.33 | |||
|1029.86 | |||
|- | |||
!11 | |||
|1650. | |||
|1567.98 | |||
|1408. | |||
|1306.82 | |||
|- | |||
!12 | |||
|1760. | |||
|1760. | |||
|1760. | |||
|1760. | |||
|} | |||
:::: And here's a chart of the same data: | |||
:::: [[File:Comparison of some harmonotonic tunings, in particular a potentially new geometric pitch sequence tuning.png|frameless|1000px]] | |||
:::: So it appears that GPS are on the other side yet of things from ALS/IFS. Please check my work. I couldn't find a direct formula for GPS in terms of <math>k</math> like I could for the other three. If you want to see my spreadsheet with formulas, let me know. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 18:54, 11 April 2023 (UTC) | |||