User talk:Xenwolf: Difference between revisions

Line 209:

: For now, what about "submajor" and "supraminor" for 26/21 and 63/52? Since there is septendecimal submajor third [[21/17]] and septendecimal supraminor third [[17/14]]. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 02:34, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

:: Hmm... I think that might work, but I can't speak for Xenwolf on this... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:58, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:34, 22 September 2020 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 18,398 edits Suggestion ← Older edit		Revision as of 02:58, 22 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 209:		Line 209:

	: For now, what about "submajor" and "supraminor" for 26/21 and 63/52? Since there is septendecimal submajor third [[21/17]] and septendecimal supraminor third [[17/14]]. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 02:34, 22 September 2020 (UTC)		: For now, what about "submajor" and "supraminor" for 26/21 and 63/52? Since there is septendecimal submajor third [[21/17]] and septendecimal supraminor third [[17/14]]. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 02:34, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

			:: Hmm... I think that might work, but I can't speak for Xenwolf on this... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 02:58, 22 September 2020 (UTC)