Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
Names for New Third and Sixth: To be or not to be (a comma), ...
Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 205: Line 205:


::: Being a comma is not a death sentence for an interval ;) As I learned, we have these ranges: 0 .. 3.5 cents for [[:Category:Unnoticeable comma|unnoticeable]], 3.5 .. 30 cents for "[[:Category:Comma|comma]]", 30 .. 100 cents for [[:Category:Medium comma|medium comma]], and 100 cents and above for [[:Category:Large comma|large commas]]. Especially the "commacity" is another dimension. I'd say even the Tone [[9/8]] is some kind of comma. I think that the higher the limit the more intervals fight for being ''the representative'' of that limit, the classic diatonic nomenclature (minor/major) helps a bit but this is also limited. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
::: Being a comma is not a death sentence for an interval ;) As I learned, we have these ranges: 0 .. 3.5 cents for [[:Category:Unnoticeable comma|unnoticeable]], 3.5 .. 30 cents for "[[:Category:Comma|comma]]", 30 .. 100 cents for [[:Category:Medium comma|medium comma]], and 100 cents and above for [[:Category:Large comma|large commas]]. Especially the "commacity" is another dimension. I'd say even the Tone [[9/8]] is some kind of comma. I think that the higher the limit the more intervals fight for being ''the representative'' of that limit, the classic diatonic nomenclature (minor/major) helps a bit but this is also limited. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
:::: At the same time, however, only intervals above 25 cents can be reasonably used as melodic intervals, and, the way I see it, commas in the purest sense can't really do that well.  Yes, I'm aware that there a limitations to the classic diatonic nomenclature, however, said nomenclature is still needed, even if we must incorporate it into a larger system. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC)