Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
Names and functions of 45/44, 55/54 and 33/32: it's hard to answer during unexpected refinements
Line 182: Line 182:


Just for the record, the only name I can currently think of for 33/32 is the "undecimal parachromatic quartertone".  This name contrasts with other more complicated undecimal intervals in the area such as 512/495, which could perhaps be called the "undecimal paradiatonic quartertone"... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:50, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Just for the record, the only name I can currently think of for 33/32 is the "undecimal parachromatic quartertone".  This name contrasts with other more complicated undecimal intervals in the area such as 512/495, which could perhaps be called the "undecimal paradiatonic quartertone"... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:50, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
: I have to admit that this observation is very new to me. I'm not even sure if I didn't mix things up. I need more time for this. BTW: I like the varicant/contravarivant regions of your graph. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 19:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)