Xenwolf
Joined 17 September 2018
No edit summary |
→Names and functions of 45/44, 55/54 and 33/32: it's hard to answer during unexpected refinements |
||
Line 182: | Line 182: | ||
Just for the record, the only name I can currently think of for 33/32 is the "undecimal parachromatic quartertone". This name contrasts with other more complicated undecimal intervals in the area such as 512/495, which could perhaps be called the "undecimal paradiatonic quartertone"... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:50, 20 September 2020 (UTC) | Just for the record, the only name I can currently think of for 33/32 is the "undecimal parachromatic quartertone". This name contrasts with other more complicated undecimal intervals in the area such as 512/495, which could perhaps be called the "undecimal paradiatonic quartertone"... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:50, 20 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
: I have to admit that this observation is very new to me. I'm not even sure if I didn't mix things up. I need more time for this. BTW: I like the varicant/contravarivant regions of your graph. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 19:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC) |