Xenharmonic Wiki:Cross-platform dialogue: Difference between revisions
Another conversation, I hope I'm not wasting anyone's time... |
m →Table comparing POTE vs KE vs CTE: minor comment on favourability of KE |
||
| Line 207: | Line 207: | ||
::As Mike pointed out below, I put the wrong KE generator for 5-limit Porcupine. I have uploaded a new version of the file that fixes this now. The file page has not yet started displaying the changes but hopefully it will soon :) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 09:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC) | ::As Mike pointed out below, I put the wrong KE generator for 5-limit Porcupine. I have uploaded a new version of the file that fixes this now. The file page has not yet started displaying the changes but hopefully it will soon :) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 09:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
::: I'd just like to note I'm very happy with KE, my feeling is that for low-accuracy temperaments CTE doesn't weight p/q over pq enough but POTE seems to overdo it, so it's very favourable that KE seems to be close to POTE but slightly in the CTE direction. Hopefully KE will continue this trend upon analysis in higher limits with various subgroups. (Not that I don't like CTE, I personally have generally liked the CTE tuning a lot for mid-to-high-accuracy temperaments, EG I think its tuning of meantone as ~2/9-comma (between 1/4 and 1/5) makes sense.) --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 21:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
=== Mike is Done For Now === | === Mike is Done For Now === | ||