Xenharmonic Wiki

User:BudjarnLambeth/Bird’s eye view of rank-2 temperaments: Difference between revisions

← Older edit
VisualWikitext
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, emailconfirmed
18,268 edits
Sintel (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, emailconfirmed
1,548 edits
m fix helmholtz link
 
(94 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Editable user page|If you see any temperaments in the wrong category, please move them to the correct category. <br><br>If you know of a temperament that is much-loved by a sizeable subset of the xen community but is not yet included here, please add it. <br><br>If you see a temperament on here that no one cares about, please remove it. But only remove it if '''nobody''' cares about it. Don't remove it just because you think it's useless. If a few other people do care about it, then don't remove it. <br><br>If you see any ways the wording of the page could be improved, please edit it to make those improvements. <br><br>If you see any typos or grammatical or factual errors, please make an edit to correct those.}}
<div style="border: 1px green solid; background-color: #efe; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin-bottom: 1em">
'''This page has been deprecated, but it is being kept in place for longevity as a reference material. Please see [[User:BudjarnLambeth/Survey of efficient temperaments by subgroup]] for the new version.'''
</div>




Line 7: Line 9:


Composers and theorists disagree amongst themselves about what properties are desirable in a temperament, and you might over time find that you lean more towards one camp or another. This list arranges temperaments by their properties, allowing you the reader to seek out temperaments with whichever properties you value.
Composers and theorists disagree amongst themselves about what properties are desirable in a temperament, and you might over time find that you lean more towards one camp or another. This list arranges temperaments by their properties, allowing you the reader to seek out temperaments with whichever properties you value.
== So, which temperaments should I use to make music? ==
Ask 5 xenharmonicists, and you'll get 10 different answers. There are many different schools of thought within RTT (regular temperament theory).
Most would agree that a good temperament approximates some subset of [[just intonation]] relatively accurately with a relatively small number of notes.
What they disagree on is ''how'' accurate is "relatively accurate", ''how'' small is "relatively small", and ''which'' JI subsets are interesting enough to be worth approximating.
For example:
'''Xenharmonicist A''' might argue that an error less than 15ish cents on most intervals, and less than 5 cents on the really important ones (like the perfect fifth and the octave), is accurate enough.
And they might argue that 25 notes per [[equave]] is the most that is practical, any more than that is too cumbersome.
They might argue that nobody can hear the harmonic effect of prime harmonics higher than 11.
And they might argue that there's no real reason to use subgroups that are missing primes 2 or 3, because those primes are so important to consonance.
'''Xenharmonicist B''' might argue that the error must be less than 5ish cents on most intervals, anything further out than that sounds out of tune to them.
They might argue that it's perfectly possible to learn up to 50 notes per [[equave]].
They might argue that they can hear the subtle, delicate effect of prime harmonics up to 23.
And they might argue that subgroups like 3.5.7.11 and 2.5.7.11 are the most fertile ground for new and exciting musical exploration.
Neither xenharmonicist can be objectively shown to be right or wrong. There is an amount of science to this, but there is also a lot of personal subjectivity. Ultimately it's up to you to decide what features you think are important in a temperament.
It might help to compare these temperaments to [[12edo]], a.k.a. the familiar 12-tone equal temperament which most modern music is tuned to by default. 12edo has, of course, 12 notes per equave, which makes it fairly small by temperament standards (but not abnormally so).
It can be interpreted as a low-to-medium accuracy 5-limit temperament where the most important intervals (the fifth and octave) have an error less than 3 cents, while other notable intervals (like the thirds and sixths) have an error of about 14 cents.
Alternatively, it can be interpreted as a high-accuracy 2.3.17.19 subgroup temperament, where all of the intervals have an error less than 5 cents.
So that should provide a point of comparison to help measure these other temperaments against.


== Guide to tables ==
== Guide to tables ==
Line 15: Line 57:
* Exotemperament: > ~18 [[cents]] of [[error]] on more than one targeted interval
* Exotemperament: > ~18 [[cents]] of [[error]] on more than one targeted interval
* Low accuracy: < ~18c error on most targeted intervals
* Low accuracy: < ~18c error on most targeted intervals
* Medium accuracy: < 12c error on almost all targeted intervals
* Medium accuracy: < 12c error on most targeted intervals
* High accuracy: < 7c error on almost all targeted intervals
* High accuracy: < 7c error on almost all targeted intervals
* Very high accuracy: < 3.5c error on almost all targeted intervals
* Very high accuracy: < 3.5c error on almost all targeted intervals
Line 83: Line 125:
|  
|  
|  
|  
| schismic aka [[helmholtz]]
| schismic aka [[Helmholtz temperament|Helmholtz]]
| [[kwazy]]
| [[kwazy]]
|}
|}
Line 114: Line 156:
! Medium accuracy (7-12c)
! Medium accuracy (7-12c)
|  
|  
| [[magic]], [[meantone]], [[sensi]], [[superpyth]]
| [[magic]], [[meantone]], [[mothra]], [[sensi]], [[superpyth]]
| [[valentine]]
| [[valentine]]
|  
|  
Line 121: Line 163:
! High accuracy (3.5-7c)
! High accuracy (3.5-7c)
|  
|  
| [[mothra]], [[orwell]]
| [[orwell]]
| [[diaschismic]], [[garibaldi]]
| [[diaschismic]], [[garibaldi]]
|  
|  
Line 129: Line 171:
|  
|  
|  
|  
| [[miracle]], [[wuerschmidt]]
| [[miracle]]
|  
|  
|  
|  
Line 169: Line 211:
|  
|  
|  
|  
| [[magic]], [[meanpop]], [[meantone]], [[valentine]]
| [[magic]], [[meanpop]], [[meantone]], [[mothra]], [[valentine]]
|  
|  
|  
|  
Line 176: Line 218:
|  
|  
|  
|  
| [[diaschismic]], [[mothra]], [[orwell]]
| [[diaschismic]], [[orwell]]
|  
|  
|  
|  
Line 183: Line 225:
|  
|  
|  
|  
| [[miracle]], [[wuerschmidt]]
| [[miracle]]
|  
|  
|  
|  
Line 223: Line 265:
|  
|  
|  
|  
| [[magic]], [[meantone]]
| [[magic]], [[meantone]], [[mothra]]
|  
|  
|  
|  
Line 230: Line 272:
|  
|  
|  
|  
| [[diaschismic]], [[mothra]], [[orwell]]
| [[diaschismic]], [[orwell]]
|  
|  
|  
|  
Line 237: Line 279:
|  
|  
|  
|  
| [[wuerschmidt]]
|  
|  
|  
|  
|  
Line 357: Line 399:
|}
|}


== No-2s ==
== 3.5.7 and its extensions ==
 
{| class="wikitable"
|+
!
! Approx. 10 notes
! Approx. 20 notes
! Approx. 30 notes
! Approx. 70 notes
! Over 100 notes
|-
! Exotemperament (18-∞c)
|
|
|
|
|
|-
! Low accuracy (12-18c)
|
|
|
|
|
|-
! Medium accuracy (7-12c)
|
|
|
|
|
|-
! High accuracy (3.5-7c)
|
|
|
|
|
|-
! Very high accuracy (1-3.5c)
|
|
|
|
|
|-
! Microtemperament (0-1c)
|
|
|
|
|
|}
 
== Other no-2s subgroups ==


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 411: Line 507:
|}
|}


== No-3s ==
== No-3s subgroups ==


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 465: Line 561:
|}
|}


== No-5s ==
== 2.3.7 and its extensions ==


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 519: Line 615:
|}
|}


== No-7s ==
== 2.3.11 and its extensions ==
 
{| class="wikitable"
|+
!
! Approx. 10 notes
! Approx. 20 notes
! Approx. 30 notes
! Approx. 70 notes
! Over 100 notes
|-
! Exotemperament (18-∞c)
|
|
|
|
|
|-
! Low accuracy (12-18c)
|
|
|
|
|
|-
! Medium accuracy (7-12c)
|
| [[neutral]] (no-5 no-7 [[rastmic]])
|
|
|
|-
! High accuracy (3.5-7c)
|
| no-5 no-7 [[pythrabian]]
|
|
|
|-
! Very high accuracy (1-3.5c)
|
|
| [[tribilo]] (no-5 no-7 [[nexus]])
|
|
|-
! Microtemperament (0-1c)
|
|
|
|
| no-5 no-7 [[frameshift]]
|}
 
== 2.3.13, 2.3.17, etc ==
 
{| class="wikitable"
|+
!
! Approx. 10 notes
! Approx. 20 notes
! Approx. 30 notes
! Approx. 70 notes
! Over 100 notes
|-
! Exotemperament (18-∞c)
|
|
|
|
|
|-
! Low accuracy (12-18c)
|
|
|
|
|
|-
! Medium accuracy (7-12c)
|
|
|
|
|
|-
! High accuracy (3.5-7c)
|
|
|
|
|
|-
! Very high accuracy (1-3.5c)
|
|
|
|
|
|-
! Microtemperament (0-1c)
|
|
|
|
|
|}
 
== No-7s subgroups ==


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 573: Line 777:
|}
|}


== No-11s ==
== No-11s subgroups ==


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 627: Line 831:
|}
|}


== Higher subgroups ==
== Other subgroups ==


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/w/User:BudjarnLambeth/Bird’s_eye_view_of_rank-2_temperaments"