Passion family

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Revision as of 12:07, 22 August 2025 by FloraC (talk | contribs) (Units. Misc. cleanup)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This is a list showing technical temperament data. For an explanation of what information is shown here, you may look at the technical data guide for regular temperaments.

The passion family of temperaments tempers out the passion comma, 262144/253125 ([18 -4 -5) in the 5-limit, which equates five instances of 16/15 with 4/3.

Passion

Subgroup: 2.3.5

Comma list: 262144/253125

Mapping[1 2 2], 0 -5 4]]

mapping generators: ~2, ~16/15

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~16/15 = 98.670 ¢

Optimal ET sequence12, 49, 61, 73

Badness (Smith): 0.168550

Septimal passion

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 64/63, 3125/3087

Mapping[1 2 2 2], 0 -5 4 10]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~16/15 = 98.153 ¢

Optimal ET sequence12, 37, 49, 110bcd

Badness (Smith): 0.062327

11-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 64/63, 100/99, 1375/1372

Mapping: [1 2 2 2 2], 0 -5 4 10 18]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~16/15 = 98.019 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 12, 37, 49

Badness (Smith): 0.040809

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 64/63, 100/99, 196/195, 275/273

Mapping: [1 2 2 2 2 2], 0 -5 4 10 18 21]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~16/15 = 97.910 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 12f, 25f, 37, 49f

Badness (Smith): 0.030886

Passionate

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 126/125, 131072/127575

Mapping[1 2 2 1], 0 -5 4 22]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~16/15 = 98.817 ¢

Optimal ET sequence12, 61, 73, 85c

Badness (Smith): 0.121293

11-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 126/125, 176/175, 8192/8019

Mapping: [1 2 2 1 1], 0 -5 4 22 30]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~16/15 = 98.721 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 12, 61, 73, 158bccee

Badness (Smith): 0.068322

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 126/125, 176/175, 343/338, 364/363

Mapping: [1 2 2 1 1 1], 0 -5 4 22 30 33]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~16/15 = 98.627 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 12f, 61, 73f

Badness (Smith): 0.052302

Pash

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 126/125, 176/175, 196/195, 1352/1331

Mapping: [1 2 2 1 1 0], 0 -5 4 22 30 45]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~16/15 = 98.791 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 12f, 61f, 73, 85ce

Badness (Smith): 0.056386

Passive

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 225/224, 256/245

Mapping[1 2 2 3], 0 -5 4 -2]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~16/15 = 98.809 ¢

Optimal ET sequence1, 11, 12, 49dd

Badness (Smith): 0.075055

Freivald

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 6144/6125, 6272/6075

Mapping[1 7 -2 12], 0 -10 8 -17]]

mapping generator: ~2, ~35/24

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~48/35 = 550.9374 ¢

Optimal ET sequence13d, 24, 37, 61, 98b

Badness (Smith): 0.209095

11-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 121/120, 176/175, 2744/2673

Mapping: [1 7 -2 12 4], 0 -10 8 -17 -1]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~11/8 = 550.9007 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 13d, 24, 37, 61

Badness (Smith): 0.077504

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 91/90, 121/120, 176/175, 512/507

Mapping: [1 7 -2 12 4 1], 0 -10 8 -17 -1 5]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~11/8 = 550.9062 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 13d, 24, 37, 61

Badness (Smith): 0.045864