User talk:Godtone: Difference between revisions

Line 80:

:: So a copy and paste error of some sort? I found [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=181edo&diff=prev&oldid=66283 a similar addition to 180edo] (surely your recent edits were the reason for your comment and ultimately my question). In that case, the part in question should be removed. But let's wait and see what Godtone answers. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 15:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

::: Yes sorry, I thought it was clear but in retrospect it could be talking about harmonics not patent val EDOs. The reason I wrote it in such a way is because its concise and seemed unambiguous to me, but also because I'm not sure how to make "from 100 EDO to 200 EDO" sound right... is it "in the range of EDOs 100 to 200" or "from 100 to 200 EDO" or something else? Anyway, I added the sentence because when looking at prime error metrics for EDOs in the range 100 to 200 it was the best one in almost every metric for a variety of limits, so it seemed worth noting. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 19:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:55, 6 March 2022 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →Meaning of a sentence: thanks, but let's see ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:17, 6 March 2022 view source Godtone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 2,412 edits m →Meaning of a sentence: clarification Newer edit →
Line 80:		Line 80:

	:: So a copy and paste error of some sort? I found [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=181edo&diff=prev&oldid=66283 a similar addition to 180edo] (surely your recent edits were the reason for your comment and ultimately my question). In that case, the part in question should be removed. But let's wait and see what Godtone answers. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 15:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)		:: So a copy and paste error of some sort? I found [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=181edo&diff=prev&oldid=66283 a similar addition to 180edo] (surely your recent edits were the reason for your comment and ultimately my question). In that case, the part in question should be removed. But let's wait and see what Godtone answers. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 15:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

			::: Yes sorry, I thought it was clear but in retrospect it could be talking about harmonics not patent val EDOs. The reason I wrote it in such a way is because its concise and seemed unambiguous to me, but also because I'm not sure how to make "from 100 EDO to 200 EDO" sound right... is it "in the range of EDOs 100 to 200" or "from 100 to 200 EDO" or something else? Anyway, I added the sentence because when looking at prime error metrics for EDOs in the range 100 to 200 it was the best one in almost every metric for a variety of limits, so it seemed worth noting. --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 19:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)