Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Inthar (talk | contribs)
Line 237: Line 237:


Do you think we have time to talk this over? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 18:41, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Do you think we have time to talk this over? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 18:41, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
:I've been growing more skeptical of the idea of regular temperaments and limiting oneself to prime-limits or subgroups over time, but maybe subgroups or telicity could still be useful if you're accurate enough. I'm also skeptical of why one would limit oneself to a chain of 11/8's when a chain of 12/11's say, is also valid, or when you could take a less "straight" path in the lattice, so I don't really see the use of telicity for me personally I'd be interested in hearing how you would use telicity musically (though my replies might be more intermittent). [[User:IlL|Inthar]] ([[User talk:IlL|talk]]) 07:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)