Relative cent: Difference between revisions

!Divisor

!3/2

|-

|101

|59.081°

|-

|102

|59.666

|-

|103

|60.251

|-

|104

|60.836

|-

|105

|61.421

|-

|106

|62.006

|-

|107

|62.591

|-

|108

|63.176

|-

|109

|63.761

|-

|110

|64.346

|-

|111

|64.931

|-

|112

|''65.516''

|-

|113

|66.101

|-

|114

|66.686

|-

|115

|67.271

|-

|116

|67.856

|-

|117

|68.441

|-

|118

|69.026

|-

|119

|69.6105

|-

|120

|70.1955

|-

|121

|70.7805

|-

|122

|71.365

|-

|123

|71.95

|-

|124

|''72.535''

|-

|125

|73.12

|-

|126

|73.705

|-

|127

|74.29

|-

|128

|74.875

|}

In other words, only each 12th divisor of the next 28 after 100 has the same problem as 100 does for use as the base of a relative cent.